Finance isn’t what it used to be.
You can feel it — rising compliance pressure, tighter budgets, late hours just to get reports out.
And the tools? Still stuck in the past. Most firms are running on spreadsheets, legacy ERPs, and scattered documentation.
Meanwhile, Generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) are showing up with a quiet promise:
less manual work, more clarity, and better decisions.
But with that comes hesitation. Is it worth the risk? What if it replaces me? What if it doesn’t work?
Let’s make sense of it — with facts, examples, real use cases, and a clear view of what GenAI and LLMs can actually do in finance… today.
Forget the tech lingo. Here’s the simplest way to look at it:
Term | What It Actually Does |
LLM (Large Language Model)  | Reads, writes, and understands financial language. Can process messy inputs — PDFs, statements, invoices — and give clean summaries. |
GenAI (Generative AI) | Creates new content: emails, reports, dashboards, scenarios. Not just text. It builds usable drafts. |
Together? | You get an assistant that’s never tired, doesn’t get bored, and gets better with every file you feed it. |
Why finance?
Because the work is full of patterns. Structured data, repetitive reviews, standard formats. GenAI and LLMs thrive in that space.
Every finance leader I’ve spoken with says the same things — in different words:
“We’re spending too much time chasing data.”
“We don’t get enough insights — just reports.”
“Audits are still painful.”
“Our juniors are stuck in grunt work.”
These are not exaggerations. A recent Deloitte report found that 61% of CFOs feel their teams spend more time preparing data than analyzing it.
Here’s what most traditional teams look like right now:
Workflow Area | Traditional Way | Common Pain Point |
Reconciliation | Manual spreadsheets | Errors, delays |
Reporting | Copy-paste into templates | No time for insights |
Audit prep | File hunting, doc sorting | Risk of missed items |
Budgeting | Static sheets + siloed input | No scenario planning |
Q&A | Endless client emails | Repetitive, low-value time use |
This is the gap GenAI and LLMs are walking into.
Not in theory. Not “one day.”
Right now.
Here’s what these tools can do today — in finance teams already using them:
Task | Without AI | With LLM + GenAI |
Expense audit | Spot checks, manual review | Full ledger scanned, outliers flagged |
Financial memo | Written from scratch | Drafted from Excel + meeting notes |
Forecast updates | Adjusted manually | GenAI builds scenarios |
Client FAQs | Answered 1:1 by humans | AI-generated replies from past tickets |
Internal SOPs | Created slowly, inconsistently | Drafted from workflows automatically |
You’re still in control.
But the first pass? Done in minutes.
Let’s say your team spends 100 hours/month on audits and reporting.
If GenAI/LLMs reduce even 30% of that, you save 30 hours. That’s almost 4 full workdays. Every month.
Here’s a practical ROI view (hypothetical but based on real client outcomes):
Area | Time Saved | Cost Impact | Outcome |
Report Generation | 40–60% | ↓ contractor hours | More time for analysis |
Audit Prep | 25–40% | ↓ external fees | Earlier issue detection |
Reconciliations | 30–50% | ↓ errors | Smoother closing cycles |
Client Comms | 60–80% | ↓ response delays | Higher satisfaction |
The biggest gain?
You stop treating humans like calculators.
And you start using their time for higher trust, deeper analysis, and better decisions.
AI adoption is never just about the tool. It’s about the people.
And finance teams face real blockers:
These are real concerns. Here’s how some firms are handling them:
Nobody’s going full auto.
They’re going assist-first.
💡 PwC Survey (2023):
“73% of CFOs say AI will be critical to their future finance function. But only 14% have adopted it meaningfully.”
💡 McKinsey Research (2023):
“Finance teams using GenAI saved 20–40% on data consolidation time — but only after 3–6 months of workflow adjustments.”
💡 Spaculus Client Survey (2024):
“Top AI use case: speeding up audit prep and expense review. Biggest fear: lack of transparency in AI decisions.”
So the desire is there.
The results are real.
But adoption isn’t plug-and-play. It takes a mindset shift.
Function | LLM & GenAI Use Case |
Accounting | Auto-categorizing transactions, detecting inconsistencies |
FP&A | Drafting reports, building forecasts, comparing past vs. current plans |
Audit | Pre-checks, auto-flagging anomalies |
Treasury | Monitoring patterns, liquidity insights |
Compliance | Summarizing regulations, flagging potential issues |
Client Support | Auto-replying to finance-related queries based on past history |
Notice: No full replacement. Just smarter first drafts and faster prep.
Let’s keep it grounded.
Here’s a before-and-after snapshot that most teams can relate to:
Workflow Step | Before | After GenAI + LLM |
Budget changes | Meetings + edits | Prompt + instant forecast |
Vendor review | Manual PDF read | LLM summary of contracts |
Board pack | Slide building from scratch | Draft slides auto-created |
Tax update | Check gov site manually | Summary sent weekly by GenAI |
What changed?
Not your job.
Just how much effort it takes to get to the part where your brain matters.
The biggest shift isn’t loud.
You won’t hear firms brag about it. But the ones using GenAI and LLMs?
They’re closing books earlier. Winning bigger clients. Reducing rework quietly behind the scenes.
They’re not faster because they work harder.
They’re faster because they’ve stopped wasting time.
📊 A regional accounting firm that adopted LLM-based reconciliation saw error rates drop by 43% within 60 days.
They didn’t lay anyone off — they just gave their analysts cleaner data to start with.
It’s not a tech race.
It’s a clarity race.
And the firms getting cleaner visibility sooner are the ones turning insights into action — while others are still formatting spreadsheets.
This part is often missed.
Using GenAI or LLMs isn’t just about automation.
It changes how finance teams think, collaborate, and grow.
Here’s how:
When used well, GenAI doesn’t just reduce tasks.
It expands your thinking space. And that’s where the real ROI lives.
Start small. Pick a pain point. Don’t automate — assist.
Here are realistic starting points:
Tip: Track time saved. Even saving 3 hours/week = 150+ hours/year.
That’s enough time to rethink something bigger.
Let’s not go too far into the future, but here’s what’s being tested now:
Some tools are experimental. Others are quietly being rolled out in big firms.
But one thing’s clear:
It’s not about if. It’s about how soon.
You don’t have to change everything.
But you can’t ignore what’s changing either.
Finance is becoming faster, clearer, more human — because the machine is finally doing the boring part.
You still matter.
Your judgment. Your experience. Your ethics. Your logic.
Let GenAI and LLMs help with the prep.
You bring the thinking.